Search for: "COOPER v. STATE"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 7,411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2010, 5:44 pm
Specifically, the court stated that “although joint ventures can be used to facilitate collusion among competitors and are therefore subject to antitrust scrutiny, see NCAA v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:52 am
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Lafler v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 11:26 am
See Cooper v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 3:07 am
Under New York State law, a probationary employee such as Rivera has no property interest in her job that would entitle her to due process rights; and 2. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:42 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 9:08 pm
[This case summarized by Leo Latella.]In United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 9:36 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 2:04 am
Also "final and binding" have long been used to state the well-recognised rule in relation to arbitration, namely that the award is final and binding and creates a res judicata, finality in litigation, between the parties. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 5:28 pm
By Jason Rantanen STC.UMN v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:27 am
Congratulations to my partners, Rick Jones and David Givens for successfully defending Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc. before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the matter of Wahi v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 7:09 am
In Burnham v. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 9:53 am
On October 10, 2017, I rejected the proffered plea agreement in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:27 pm
Knorr v. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 8:41 am
The focus was on cooperation and synergies in energy and infrastructure. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
Given the differing traditions from which its judges are drawn, and bearing in mind that the court has not regarded the award of just satisfaction as its principal concern, it is not altogether surprising that it has generally dealt with the subject relatively briefly, and has offered little explanation of its reasons for awarding particular amounts or for declining to make an award”, per Lord Reed, Regina (Faulkner) v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] 2 AC 254 [34]. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 11:00 am
On Monday, in Berger v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 2:42 pm
., Et Al. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 2:34 pm
Section V then focuses on the alternative to ideology and economic reform offered through Chinese Party and state practice. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 8:58 am
Rob WeinerDuring the Supreme Court oral argument in King v. [read post]
