Search for: "County v. State" Results 2381 - 2400 of 33,757
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2010, 3:22 am
County Personnel Department refuses to certify the payroll following the appointment of an individual not among the three highest on the eligible listMatter of Gramando v Putnam County Personnel Dept., 58 AD3d 842The Carmel Central School District appointed Joseph Gramando to the position of Director of School Facilities, Operations, and Transportation.When Paul Eldridge, Director of the Putnam County Personnel Department, refused to certify the payroll appointing… [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 9:30 am by azatty
While visiting the museum you will get a sense of Maricopa County’s legal history, its court cases and important elements of the Rule of Law, including individual rights and liberties guaranteed in the United States and Arizona constitutions. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 6:33 am by Dwight Sullivan
An alter reader sent us this link to a North County Times article about Martin v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 9:58 am
Marion County Department of Child Services and Child Advocates, Inc. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 6:08 pm
";  and the Florida Supreme Court citing what it called the "still valid law of Plessy v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:25 am
This would appear to have violated the Fourth Amendment under the rule announced in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:09 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Weimer received a remand hearing pursuant to State v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 7:55 am by Rick Hasen
I noted on the blog the other day that the state of Georgia, after losing in the state court of appeals, declined to appeal further the ruling that Georgia law allows counties to set Saturday as a day of early… Continue reading The post If Petitioners Get Their Way in Moore v. [read post]
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the district court’s dismissal of the claim, holding that Petitioner is required to seek a remedy for the taking through the California state courts, rather than the federal courts, pursuant to Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 5:01 am
Meredith.From an appeal of a pretrial order denying the defendant's motion for an ex parte hearing regarding pretrial use and disclosure of confidential records he had previously subpoenaed and reviewed in the trial court's chambers, the Court of Special Appeals granted the State's motion to dismiss this interlocutory appeal, on the grounds that the ruling below was not immediately reviewable under the collateral order doctrine.On trial in Montgomery County for… [read post]