Search for: "DOE v. Smith" Results 2381 - 2400 of 6,568
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2018, 2:00 am by admin
But the law does provide for compensation for emotional distress. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:30 am by Scott Bomboy
Justice Willis Van Devanter made perhaps the most famous statement of these powers in McGrain v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 6:15 am
Smith Lumber v Decina, ___ Mich ___ (2007), the Michigan Supreme Court held that "To be awarded attorney fees as a 'prevailing party' under MCL 570.1118(2), the party must prevail on the lien foreclosure action. * * * The language of [the statute] does not permit recovery of attorney fees on the contract action merely because it was brought together with the lien foreclosure action. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:05 am
Smith and Wall LLJ agreed with Pill LJ. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:54 am
I was recently lucky enough to have Miranda Bernabei, who successfully argued the Smith case, as well as a number of others (see below, Doe v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:30 am by Joe Rich and Thomas Silverstein
Texas contends that the text of the Act must be read to prohibit only disparate treatment because of the Court’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 8:36 am by admin
Smith [Previous Months In Review here: Oct 09, Sep 09, Aug 09, Jul 09, Jun 09, May 09, Apr 09, Mar 09, Feb 09, Jan 09] The more I write about housing, the more entangled it becomes with the fabric of cities, formally and informally. [read post]