Search for: "Doe VI"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 5,623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2012, 8:55 pm
Disclaimer: This article cannot, and does not, create any attorney/client or consultant/client relationship. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 7:24 am
Thus, even though a franchisee does not pay the franchisor or its affiliates an initial franchise fee, the fee element may still be satisfied. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:47 pm
The court ruled that the law does not grant the body the authority to obtain the land, thus deeming the acquisition illegal. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:02 am
“This does not mean that the petitioner is entitled to a name change. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:00 am
Of all those proposals, this one is the most transparent in its meaning and effect, and has the virtue of being “self-executing” in the sense that it does not rely on the judiciary to check the powers of Congress. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 10:37 pm
VI. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:10 pm
The court ultimately found generic usage in Australia does not establish a generic meaning in the United States. [read post]
20 May 2017, 6:40 am
The court found that this rule does not apply to defendants who plead guilty and the rule is intended for defendants who go to trial. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 7:55 am
Suspiciously high ridership projections were used to justify the half-billion dollar project in lieu of improvements to existing transit services, prompting an investigation that found BART committed a Title VI civil rights violation in pursuing the project. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 12:00 pm
Christensen (D-VI) has been a big champion for the environment and a cheerleader for eliminating health disparities for years. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 8:20 am
While the court of appeals does review these cases de novo, it relies on the court's factual findings. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 3:53 am
Lee] would appear to stand for the proposition that the First Amendment provides robust protection for much speech that criticizes, opposes, and disparages others’ exercise of rights under the Fair Housing Act, and that the speech does not lose protection just because others regard it as retaliatory or discouraging to the exercise of rights. [read post]
15 May 2023, 3:55 am
This phrase does not refer to elected officials. [read post]
10 May 2012, 10:06 am
VI. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 8:56 am
In addition to clarifying the categorization of unrelated business silos, the proposed rule makes clear that for purposes of the 509(a)(1)/170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and 509(a)(2) public support tests, net income from unrelated business activities is calculated without consideration of the siloing rules. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 11:26 am
The court found that SFFA does have standing because some of its members are ready to pursue the admissions process at West Point. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 1:27 pm
It does not matter whether what you are suing about has any merit so long as there was no reasonable cause for bringing suit—even if your opponent cannot prove his position. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 8:21 am
For example, does Y get anything if X signed a sales contract to sell the Marco Island condominium before his death, but the sale didn't close until after he died? [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 10:10 pm
VI. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:00 pm
" How does one get inside the head of a defendant to know if s/he had the requisite statutory intent to "coerce, intimidate, or harass" another person by publishing another person's primary residence address, social security number, or bank account number, as for instances, rather than having the intent to be rude, obnoxious, or stupid? [read post]
