Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 9,566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2024, 11:25 am
Video Transcript 0:05 one of the things 0:07 that you know my parents instilled is 0:12 that there’s an opportunity every day 0:15 for us to make a difference in someone’s 0:18 life 0:21 and many days I’ll miss 0:24 it but the great news is is that I’ll 0:27 have another opportunity tomorrow you 0:30 know I think that um there are so many 0:33 people that um don’t have the blessings 0:38 uh in terms of being able to do things 0:40… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
A patent is invalid for anticipation under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm
[…] this court addressed infringement, under section 271(e)(2)(A), of the same patent at issue in Elan, by the same generic drug at issue in Elan, but for a different does of that drug. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:37 pm
Invoking 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
Does the EPC confer jurisdiction on the EPO to determine whether a party validly claims to be a successor in title as referred to in Article 87(1)(b) EPC? [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:14 pm
" 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:40 am
That player makes an act of communication when it intervenes, in full knowledge of the consequences of its action, to give its customers access to a protected work, and does so in particular where without that intervention its customers would not, in principle, be able to enjoy the broadcast work" [para 37, recalling GS Media, para 35].The AG then tackled the thorny issue of whether transmission is actually required [readers will remember that the European… [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 5:10 am
That player makes an act of communication when it intervenes, in full knowledge of the consequences of its action, to give its customers access to a protected work, and does so in particular where without that intervention its customers would not, in principle, be able to enjoy the broadcast work" [para 37, recalling GS Media, para 35].The AG then tackled the thorny issue of whether transmission is actually required [readers will remember that the European Copyright… [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 8:37 am
” It is unclear what happens when the “true candidate” does not exist in the gallery—does NGI still return possible matches? [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:47 pm
Even a divorce does not revoke an adoption. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:47 am
Patent 4,687,777 was not invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 11:21 am
Downtown Dallas from the west near interstate 35-E On January 1, 2016 the new open carry law goes into effect across Texas. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 4:48 pm
Some states, such as California, have expressly determined that the method does not comply with state wage-and-hour laws. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:03 pm
Under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 3:15 pm
Specifically, in the RID, ALJ Essex determined that: (1) the accused refrigerators do not infringe the asserted claims of the ‘130 patent literally or under the doctrine of equivalents; (2) claims 1, 2, 4, 6, and 9 of the ‘130 patent are invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 3:45 am
EPA, 809 F.2d 1, 11 (D.C.Cir.1986) (same). [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
" Does diversity matter? [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:38 pm
The FDA, however, turned to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to evaluate the 510(k) process and answer two essential questions: (1) Does the 510(k) process protect patients and promote innovations? [read post]
15 May 2013, 3:54 am
One of the most powerful of these is the new post-grant review (PGR) proceeding that allows patent challenges on any validity ground, including issues arising from 35 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 11:53 am
Minnesota Statute § 179A.03, Subd. 14(e) excludes from the definition of a public employee, “part-time employees whose service does not exceed the lesser of 14 hours per week or 35 percent of the normal work week in the employee's appropriate unit. [read post]