Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 3,413
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
As seen [above], process variant (b) [of claim 1] of the second auxiliary request does not comply with the requirement of novelty pursuant to A 54(1) and A 54(3) with respect to the prior but post-published document D1 […]. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 11:01 am
As a matter of fact, this wording does not exclude that there may be further components, such as builder substances that are not water-soluble.[2.5] Examples A to D of document D4, which were cited by the [opponent] define laundry detergent or cleaning compositions which are within the scope of claim 1 of the impugned patent and which further comprise the builder substance zeolite, which is not water-soluble. [2.6] Therefore, in view of the above considerations, the claimed… [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:15 pm
Where does all that leave us? [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
5 (1). [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
Offshore Wind Power Generation (Robert Vilter, New York) The Obama Administration is pursuing the development of 10 gigawatts of offshore wind-generating capacity by 2020, and 54 gigawatts by 2030. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
In a list of suitable amines of different structure […], wherein ethylene diamine is referred to as a “preferred amine” […] the last paragraph of page 6 also mentions amines having a secondary and no primary amino group: dimethylamine, N-methyl-ethylamine, N-methyl- octylamine, and dibutylamine.Those last-mentioned amines in the list of exemplary amines of D1, therefore, fulfil the requirements of amines according to variant (b) of claim 1 of the present main… [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:56 pm
Measure 49 does not mandate any particular process for establishing vested rights. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
En Banc 147, 149-54 (2011). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:32 am
Super. 54, 60 (App. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 8:33 am
I’ll take these one at a time. 1. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:08 am
§ 2615(a)(1) (emphasis added). [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:39 pm
Hang out here. 1. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:12 am
Who are “the 1 percent”? [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 6:26 pm
While the Arbitration Clause does not refer explicitly to collective claims, the Court concludes that it does authorize such claims to proceed before an arbitrator. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 2:56 pm
Smith, 986 S.W.2d 54 (Tex. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:59 am
The Department does not adjudicate a dispute. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:47 am
But expenses will need to be brought under control if demand does not pick up. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:32 am
Ct. at 2252-54, 53 L. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:02 am
S 54(3) of the 1998 Act provides that it is outside the “devolved competence” of the Scottish Ministers to exercise any of their functions in any way which would be outside the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:04 am
(In re Border Rolling Mills Inc.), 54 F. [read post]
