Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
Ltd v Knight Steamship Co. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 11:03 pm
Colman J held that the Indian injunction could not be enforced in England either under the common law or the English enforcement legislation, and that it did not create a right to an English anti-suit injunction either: Airbus v Patel [1996] ILPr 465. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Schmid and V. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:13 am
Next week’s oral arguments in King v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:31 am
Remedies for defaults under loans secured by real property varies on a state-by-state basis. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:41 pm
For a case that the Court of Justice of the European Communities has yet to hear, Case C-235/09 DHL Express France SAS v Chronopost SA (noted by the IPKat here and later here) has generated a surprising degree of interest. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
29 May 2013, 9:29 am
The question the Justices confronted in Trevino v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 1:19 pm
Foxworth v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:05 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 4:10 am
To the extent Trump v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 1:58 pm
That was for the specific reason that one of the important Indian cases on the point - State of UP v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 8:03 am
Indiana State Bar Assoc., et al v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:24 pm
As for (both ante- and post-) nuptial agreements, Wilson J commented in S v S (Matrimonial Proceedings: Appropriate Forum) [1997] 1 WLR 1200, Where other jurisdictions, both in the United States and in the European Community, have been persuaded that there are cases where justice can only be served by confining parties to their rights under prenuptial agreements, we should be cautious about too categorically asserting the contrary. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:51 am
Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof"). [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 3:51 pm
ShareIn Smith v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Among the English authorities there were a couple of cases that required particular comment. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
That is the threat posed by state power in our century. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 11:19 am
In Ake v. [read post]
