Search for: "French v. French" Results 2381 - 2400 of 5,347
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2016, 4:05 am by SHG
Here’s what the creator of the code, Vĕra Jourová, the EU commissioner for justice, consumers and gender equality, said about it, referring to the terrorism in Paris and Brussels: “The recent terror attacks have reminded us of the urgent need to address illegal online hate speech,” she said. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:22 am by Winston Maxwell and Mathilde Gérot
” According to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), Member States must ensure “simultaneous and uniform” application of regulations (CJEU, 7 February 1973, Commission v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Alberta v Greter, 2016 ABQB 293 [30] Ms. [read post]
26 May 2016, 9:29 pm by Ron Coleman
Panel on “fluid,” legacy & heritage marks – @MariaBaratta discussing Macy’s v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
 Non-French residents would still be able to access the content, either by using Non-EU domains within the EU, or any domain outside of it. [read post]
26 May 2016, 12:25 pm by Victoria Kwan
Two days later, he spoke at a panel discussion for the Brooklyn Bar Association, where he defended the Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 9:58 am by Stewart Baker
Michael also explains just how deliberately meaningless is the Supreme Court decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
But if French law applies globally, how long will it be until other countries – perhaps less open and democratic – start demanding that their laws regulating information likewise have global reach? [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Google jury won't see in trial phase one https://t.co/taNf1sV25Y -> The biggest problem for the Oracle v. [read post]
21 May 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Link to decision of UKSC affirming interim privacy injunction in PJS case https://t.co/353BdBzw7Q -> Competition Bureau to examine whether fintech sector should be regulated https://t.co/J8oLZJbQ24 -> Seggie v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:37 am
 Because the Regulation merely limited the "use" of trade marks they did not strip away the trade mark owner;s right to prevent or exclude others from using their mark (citing Arnold J in Pinterest v Premium Interest). [read post]
18 May 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Heritage Capital Corp. v. [read post]