Search for: "Germany v. Germany"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 4,533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2015, 3:52 am
BASCA v Secretary of State for Innovation and Skills [2015] EWHC 1723 (Admin) [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 4:18 am
Austin's employer was a non-subscriber.And the court also upheld the lower court's ruling in Seabright Insurance Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:32 am
Frankly, it probably shouldn’t even have been taken up,” President Obama said in Germany. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 2:40 am
The whole Oracle v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 1:14 pm
President Obama addressed the issue of immigration reform during a news conference after the G-7 summit in Germany on Monday. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:17 am
Speaking to reporters after the G7 Summit in Krun, Germany, President Obama explained why his administration is not making any efforts to prepare for the possibility of a Supreme Court decision in favor of the plaintiffs in King v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:20 am
This question, posed in relation to the law of the Bahamas, was answered by the Privy Council in Gold Rock Limited v Nylund Hylton [2015] UKPC 17, about which guest blogger Kevin Winters tells all.Copyright cases for the CJEU: have your sayTwo more references, respectively from Germany and the Netherlands, are heading the CJEU’s desks. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
This Kat posted a short report of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, judgment delivered by Lord Justice Floyd in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556, and has in the meantime been cogitating and ruminating (hard as that is for a non-ruminant carnivore) on what it all means.To remind readers on where we were before this appeal decision, Warner-Lambert marketed the drug pregabalin for three authorised indications -- epilepsy,… [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:50 am
Invalidity was sought on relative grounds under Article 8(1)(b) in combination with Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation 207/2009, the application being based on an International Registration for the word mark STAYER, having effect in Germany in respect of goods in classes 3, 8 and 16.The contested CTMThe Cancellation Division rejected the invalidity claim, finding that Zao Korporaciya had not shown genuine use of its own mark for the goods it had been registered, as requested by the CTM… [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:56 pm
Given that the readership of the two weblogs is not coterminous and that this post is of substantial interest to the copyright community, it seemed prudent to make sure that readers of the 1709 Blog got to see and, if necessary, act upon it.Two Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) copyright cases are the subject of an invitation to comment, issued by the UK Intellectual Property Office as a means of evaluating whether the UK government should make observations to the court.The… [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
However, it's always pleasant to be asked for one's opinion.The first in this recent brace of references is Case C-117/15 Reha Training Gesellschaft für Sport- und Unfallrehabilitation mbH v Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte (GEMA), a request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) in a case that involves a rehabilitation facility. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 12:41 am
So Max Mosley has done a deal with Google in respect of his claim that Google had breached his rights under the DPA 1998 by refusing to block certain images and videos accessible via the Google search engine (see this FT article which suggests that the settlement also applies to claims brought by Mr Mosley in Germany and France). [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:57 am
MDEQ v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:15 am
| OHIM’s rebranding | LV’s pattern as trade mark | EPO and trade unions | Patent and first-mover advantage | Libraries’ right to digitise their collection in Germany. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:28 am
Von Braun’s crown jewel was his developing the Saturn V rocket that carried men to the moon. [read post]
21 May 2015, 11:41 am
” Such was the conclusion of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Hefferan v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:44 am
The referring court this time is the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) and the questions posed are two in number: 1. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:30 am
However, since the Clark v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:01 am
| OHIM’s rebranding | LV’s pattern as trade mark | EPO and trade unions | Patent and first-mover advantage | Libraries’ right to digitise their collection in Germany.Never too late 42 [week ending on Sunday 19 April] – WIPO Roving Seminars in Israel | Foster v Svenson, or "of taking pictures of your neighbours" | Trade marks and social networks | Jan Rosen on CJEU's public criterion to assess whether linking amounts… [read post]
18 May 2015, 10:42 am
Some in Germany questioned the report’s authenticity, as it was published just as the agency is facing heavy criticism in a spy scandal. [read post]
