Search for: "HEAD v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 2,908
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
Metaphysics: Toney v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
He was the head of the New York Society for the Suppression of Vice, which he founded in 1873. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Wired) The South strikes back against overreaching IP enforcement: (Intellectual Property Watch) WIPO assembly set to appoint new head: (Managing Intellectual Property) Open business systems fill gap in mainstream entertainment industry: (Intellectual Property Watch) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Brand values collapse in the face of global financial turmoil: (IAM), Genericness survey results: (Property, intangible) Reputation as risk: a lesson from the financial… [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am
Indeed, the DPA becomes so simple that according to one legal commentator in an Independent article headed “‘Ambulance chasers’ cashing in on internet’s ‘right to be forgotten’”, there is no need to instruct lawyers at all to make take-down requests of Google. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 1:04 am
Copyright Office is understaffed and could face additional strains in the future, according testimony by the head of the Office. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO upholds one of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF’s) human stem cell patents (decisions are pending on two other patents): (IPKat), (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), English High Court rules Qualcomm’s patents invalid in battle against Nokia: (Philip Brooks), (IPEG), (IP… [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at [duncanbucknell.com]Highlights this week included:EU wants 95 year copyright on recordings: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Intellectual Property Watch), (IP Law360),Harvard Arts and Sciences Faculty decides to allow open access to research: (Techdirt), (Michael Geist), (Ars Technica), (Against Monopoly),Summary judgment hearing 8 Feb: Tafas & GSK v Dudas concerning implementation of the USPTO’s new… [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 9:11 am
Cunniffe (1st Cir. 2011) and ACLU v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:42 am
Metromail Cy Pres Fund, The Supnick, et al. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 7:02 am
However, keeping in line with the theme of surprise this week, Olson also joined forces with his opposing counsel in Bush v Gore, David Boies, to bring and win a federal suit to overturn Prop 8 banning gay marriage in California in Perry v Schwarzenegger.A few weeks ago, Google submitted a motion to the 2nd Circuit court to consolidate the appeals of Viacom and the class action suit headed by the Premier League. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:25 am
., DeLisio v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
,SwitzerlandSwitzerland to introduce regulation for patent attorneys: (BLOG@IP::JUR)United Kingdom2007 Annual IP Crime Report released by UK-IPO: (BLOG@IP::JUR), (IAM)Patents Act 2004 (Commencement No. 4 and Transitional Provisions) Order 2007 has been published in order to put in place the final batch of changes to the UK Patents Act 1977 made by the Patents Act 2004: (IPKat)United StatesUnited States Supreme Court to clarify patent exhaustion doctrine in Quanta… [read post]
5 May 2021, 5:02 am
" In Rasoulzadeh v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm
Doe A. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Moreover, under a 1987 ruling from the Supreme Court in California Federal Savings v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm
Francisco at lectern during oral argument in Seila Law v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:36 pm
In the case, Whitney v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:36 am
Whilst it is clear that Article 82 provides for claims for compensation for both material and non-material damage, the courts seem to be slow to award damages under the latter head. [read post]
