Search for: "Hill v. United States"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 2,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2011, 11:48 pm
Geoffrey Lin (Hogan Lovells) described his personal involvement with the Chint v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:17 pm
COLORADO) The Office of the United States Trustee 999 Eighteenth Street, Suite 1551 Denver, Colorado 80202 Phone: (303) 312-7230 [read post]
26 May 2017, 8:00 am
Eid v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 12:40 pm
United States, 63 Fed. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:04 am
Over Federal Restrictions
Legal Times
Gun rights advocates have filed a new lawsuit in Washington, D.C., federal court, this time seeking to make it possible for American expats to buy guns when they're back home in the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am
” Representing the United States, Assistant to the U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 7:44 am
As a result, indirect purchaser class actions in the United States often are not certified for class treatment under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) or comparable class action rules in state courts. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:40 pm
” The report goes on to state that both the United States and Israel have been accused of sabotaging key aspects of the Iranian military in the past in the hopes of derailing Iran’s controversial nuclear program. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
Tenn. 2010); In re Prairie Hills Golf & Ski Club, 255 B.R. 228 (Bankr. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm
THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill · Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University · Ingraham v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
Section 502B originated as a major legislative outcome of human rights oversight efforts on Capitol Hill in the wake of Watergate and the Vietnam War, but Congress has underutilized the oversight tool in recent decades. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm
Narratives of litigation abuse were rampant in the national media and gaining steam in Washington, D.C., from the K Street lobby firms to the halls on Capitol Hill. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Finally, sometimes just the risk of suspension may pressure politicians and other speakers to avoid taking positions a company dislikes, as Justice Stevens warned about in Citizens United.[74] To be sure, being banned by Twitter and Facebook might in some situations be good publicity, especially if one is trying to make a name for oneself: It's still rare enough to be a news story. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 1:01 am
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911), has undergone significant reevaluation beginning with John S. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and… [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:33 am
In the United States, a handful of instances were identified involving Internet service providers (ISPs) slowing transmission speeds (“throttling”) or limiting access to competitors’ services, but those cases were resolved through existing means by the FCC or the courts. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:33 am
In the United States, a handful of instances were identified involving Internet service providers (ISPs) slowing transmission speeds (“throttling”) or limiting access to competitors’ services, but those cases were resolved through existing means by the FCC or the courts. [read post]
