Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 3,854
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2023, 3:51 am
” Does that mean any office holder, state or federal, has standing? [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:22 pm
” In light of the implications of this decision and the parties involved, this case will be appealed to the Federal Circuit and quite possibly could find its way to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:17 pm
I agree with Samsung that the United States Patent & Trademark Office didn't accept or reject certain claim language with a view to an article-of-manufacture determination in a future damages case. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 6:23 am
” Under Kelo v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 5:19 pm
Holder, which gutted a key provision of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 1:14 pm
Holder, 400 F. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 7:38 am
“The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude,” read the amendment’s first section. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
The Montana Supreme Court explicitly rejected Citizens United and refused to invalidate this state law. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 2:09 pm
The United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) has just ordered a U.S. import ban against older iPhones and iPads which were found to infringe a cellular standard-esential patent (SEP) asserted by Samsung, U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:42 am
I just watched the live webcast of today's hearing of the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights of the Judiciary Committee of the United States Senate on "Standard Essential Patent [SEP] Disputes and Antitrust Law". [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:02 am
As Tocqueville observed long before Ken Paxton and his ilk blighted the federal courts, "[s]carcely any political question arises in the United States that is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 11:02 pm
Koh's upcoming FTC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 3:29 am
By contrast, in Oracle v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 5:49 am
In Holder v. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 8:02 am
Holder. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 1:44 pm
United States. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:00 pm
Next Tuesday, in Credit Suisse v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
§ 1334(a) and (b) and the Standing Order of Reference entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
