Search for: "In Re: White v." Results 2381 - 2400 of 4,000
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  ThinkGeek: April Fool’s joke fake T-shirt: Unicorn, the new white meat. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Don’t want to use legal bypasses to represent them as something they’re not. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 2:59 am by SHG
  "Prosecutors think they're doing the Lord's work, and that they wear the white hat. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 9:30 pm
  We're expected to disregard what our own reading of the text of the Constitution tells us - who're you going to believe, me or your lying eyes? [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:03 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Last we checked, it costs adoptive parents $27,500 to adopt a child (see here: In re TSW, page 127). [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
All this suggests that providing pseudonymity to members of particular religious groups might violate the principle of the Texas Monthly v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 12:36 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Rich people are more likely to acquire IP rights than poor people; whites than minorities in the US; males than females. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 11:31 am by John Elwood
Thanks to Eric White and Conor McEvily for compiling and drafting this update. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 8:21 am
Justin White, No. 07-1031 (Green, J.) [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 12:37 pm
We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. [read post]
22 May 2011, 8:57 am by Lovechilde
We see Beckett v Verlander, and then Lester v Doug Davis. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 11:16 pm
You don’t have to buy an adapter (they cost $29) right away, but if you’re going to be in a class where presentations will be given, check the A/V equipment early in the game to see if you’ll need to buy an adapter. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 4:53 am by SHG
That was January, 1996, and the decision was United State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am by Josh Richman
Clearview AI, a 2020 lawsuit alleging violation of Illinois residents’ privacy rights under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act  EFF’s amicus brief in ACLU v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The first is essentially what the originalists have been saying in response to that school, namely that there's too much play in the joints, too many different ways to read these underlying normative principles—we're back to the age-old back-and-forth of "your constitutional theory generates indeterminate results and can't constrain judges' politics! [read post]