Search for: "JUDGE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 3,218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2021, 12:05 pm
This case, Mayorkas v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:05 am
In Thomas's world, the residential segregation in the United States and educational segregation that follows it have been the product of purely private choices. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 3:20 pm
RT ultimately registered as a "foreign agent" with the United States government. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:02 pm
Authored by: Katherine Smith Dedrick (kdedrick@RiskWorldwide.com) The growing awareness in the United States regarding carbon emissions and their effect on the environment and weather patterns, have produced an increase in environmental litigation and some important decisions from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
The Counterargument of Judges Brown and Kavanaugh In a 2010 case, al-Bihani v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:18 am
Your pals, The Supreme Court of the United States of America At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr offers a follow up on Dennys Rodriguez, the prevailing party in Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 3:00 am
United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:37 am
In November 2005, "a senior United States official" asked Canada to consent to further delay in Khadr's release so that the US officials "could 'get their act together' with respect to extradition plans. [read post]
12 May 2017, 8:00 am
United States of America, No. 16-2109, U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court stated in Seminole Nation v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
Dustcontrol International (EPLAW) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): Infringement action won't be stayed pending foreign decision in non-patent claim: Elmotech Ltd & Anor v Guidance Ltd & Anor (PatLit) United States US General Director Kappos testimony to Congress (Patently-O) Judge Michel: USPTO should receive $1 billion infusion of cash (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) The US Reporting on IPRs - the Watch List (IP tango) Industrial… [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:05 am
The panel is comprised of Judges Linn, Dyk, and Prost, and attorneys representing FLFMC, Wham-O, the US government, and the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America argued before the Court. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's… [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
United States, scheduled for oral arguments in September before a panel of judges from the U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 10:49 am
In that case, although the plaintiffs ultimately failed to have the Irish courts accept their case, they succeeded in subjecting the defendant to two years of litigation (in both the Circuit Court and High Court) despite the lack of any real connection to Ireland, and despite the fact that the material published would not have been actionable in the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 10:49 am
In that case, although the plaintiffs ultimately failed to have the Irish courts accept their case, they succeeded in subjecting the defendant to two years of litigation (in both the Circuit Court and High Court) despite the lack of any real connection to Ireland, and despite the fact that the material published would not have been actionable in the United States. [read post]
