Search for: "James v. State"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 9,414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2024, 12:03 pm
This is a major ruling validating the legitimacy of competitive keyword advertising, which occurs when an advertiser purchases and displays ads triggered in response to third-party trademarks. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 2:15 pm
I (1888); Tilghman v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
Over in the States, London-based solicitor Mark Lewis is working with Norman Siegel of Siegel Teitelbaum & Evans LLP and Steven Hyman of McLaughlin & Stern LLP to look into allegations of phone hacking in the US. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:05 pm
United States: Bargained Justice and a System of Efficiencies by Lucian E. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:25 pm
Oren Tamir (University of Arizona, James E. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:50 am
James W. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm
(“Esmark”) and its Founder/Chairman and former CEO James Bouchard under Section 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 14e-8 thereunder, in connection with Esmark’s failed bid to acquire United States Steel Corporation (“U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 2:14 pm
Makor Issues & Rights Ltd; James P. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 8:15 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 2:23 pm
The Ninth, happily, does not.United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 11:25 am
State of Indiana (NFP) James M. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 8:16 am
The facts of Weimer v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:29 am
Agency v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:35 am
In Pierson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:31 am
This week, in State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:54 am
The Court of Appeals in El Paso recently addressed one of the problems in State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Véase Pueblo v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 1:42 am
The second two appeals, R (Haney) v The Secretary of State for Justice and R (Kaiyam) v The Secretary of State for Justice will decide whether a delay in transferring the appellants to open prisons violated their rights under ECHR, arts 5 and 14 and whether the Court should depart from the precedent in R (James & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKHL 22 and R (Clift & Ors) v Secretary of State… [read post]
