Search for: "Levis v. Levis" Results 2381 - 2400 of 3,007
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
The Press Gazette has commented on the Report’s publication focusing on its suggestions that technology companies be subject to a levy to finance regulation. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 3:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  What kinds of things people react to as stealing v. legit borrowing matters.A: Moral facts: a prior Q. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
In a submission to the Department of Justice review of the Defamation Act 2009, the Public Relations Institute of Ireland has argued that the press regulator should be able to levy fines on publishers Japan The Supreme Court has rejected a right to be forgotten claim against Google by a man convicted of child prostitution. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism blog, Alex Antoniou analyses the recent decision in R v Peacock. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am by INFORRM
On 9 November 2011, the same judge began hearing an application in the case of Levy v Coomber. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:23 am by INFORRM
  This week it has a post on Mr Hemming’s change of  mind on the ZAM v CFW case. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:26 am by Marie Louise
– practical ramifications of ECJ’s decision in MPS v Murphy and FAPL v QC Leisure (1709 Copyright Blog) Levies for private copying when blank media are imported: who pays? [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Canada Michael Geist has analysed recent calls by the Canadian Music Group for the government to levy a copyright tax on the use of broadband data. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Focus Graphite Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:19 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
Some steps need to be followed: “The levying officer must have failed to take custody of the property; made demand of the judgment debtor, if the debtor can be located; the levying officer must then make a return that the property cannot be obtained” (para 31). [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On 21 December 2011, Eady J gave judgment in the “harassment” case of Neocleous v Jones ([2011] EWHC 3459 (QB)) Two judgments were also given in relation to “phone hacking indemnity” claims, Coulson v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3482 (QB)) and Mulcaire v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3469 (Ch)). [read post]