Search for: "Levy v. Levy" Results 2381 - 2400 of 2,980
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Focus Graphite Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:19 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
Some steps need to be followed: “The levying officer must have failed to take custody of the property; made demand of the judgment debtor, if the debtor can be located; the levying officer must then make a return that the property cannot be obtained” (para 31). [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:06 am
As such, it would breach the constitutional principle according to which all citizens stand equal before the charges levied by the state.(5) Misinterpretation of liability rulesISP/IBPs are not liable for the infringements at stake, to which the Court agreed. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 10:53 am by Florian Mueller
If major smartphone makers held out as long as automotive companies (even Volkswagen's limited Avanci license falls far short of what it actually needs), there'd be dozens of large-scale disputes (like Nokia v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 6:25 am
Just think of the forthcoming Batman v Superman ... [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
He concludes, largely on the strength of the SCOTUS opinion in Hartman v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On 21 December 2011, Eady J gave judgment in the “harassment” case of Neocleous v Jones ([2011] EWHC 3459 (QB)) Two judgments were also given in relation to “phone hacking indemnity” claims, Coulson v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3482 (QB)) and Mulcaire v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3469 (Ch)). [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:24 am by Eugene Volokh
., In re Anonymous Online Speakers, 661 F.3d 1168, 1173 (9th Cir. 2011) (discussing the "fear of economic or official retaliation") [2] For an example of the threat of such ostracism, levied against the writer of anonymous letter, see Brief of Appellee Rabbi Jack Bieler, Hager-Katz v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 2:11 pm by Howard Knopf
Both judgments were penned by Stratas, J.A.The first FCA decision is Entertainment Software Assoc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:34 pm by Howard Knopf
This is potentially a cost of $6.5 million a year for Canadian taxpayers, which seems absurd in view of the Supreme Court of Canada's CCH v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:09 pm by Howard Knopf
AUCC’s objection was filed by Glen Bloom, who acted for the law publishers in the CCH v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 1:34 pm by Patricia Hughes
The RCMP stopped him and issued a fine of $240, costs and the victim surcharge levy. [read post]