Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 2381 - 2400 of 21,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2022, 12:59 pm
  Call a Dallas-Fort Worth Child Sexual Abuse Defense Attorney In today’s day and age, accusations of child sexual abuse are widespread. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 7:42 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
Court Finds Question of Whether Defendant Had Knowledge of Dangerous Condition Was a Matter for the Jury, Rejecting Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, South Florida Personal Injury Lawyers Blog, published January 5, 2018. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
Duress or coercion (as a term of jurisprudence) is a possible legal defense, one of four of the most important justification defenses, by which defendants argue that they should not be held liable because the actions that broke the law were only performed out of an immediate fear of injury. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Nealon of the Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas denied a Defendant hospital’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the Plaintiff’s ostensible agency theory of liability for an independent contractor physician. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 5:04 pm by Julie Lam
  The Court of Appeals concluded that application of the doctrine of res judicata in this case to bar Plaintiff’s Section 171 claim against defendants would subvert the intent of the Legislature because it would, in effect, read a rule of mandatory party joinder in Section 171. [read post]
If the model’s outputs are not human-generated, as copyright precedent has suggested, it remains unclear who may be liable for content that raises concerns. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 5:16 pm by Mack Sperling
If a bartender serves a visibly intoxicated customer with even more alcohol and the customer then causes an accident while driving drunk, the bartender can be liable under North Carolina's Dram Shop Act, N.C. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 1:10 pm
The plaintiff, a 45-year-old male, allegedly suffered bulging discs at L4-5 and L5-S1 after being struck by defendant's car while crossing the street. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 11:47 am by Tobias Lutzi
Under the applicable tort statute, the fact that both parties had engaged in aerial activities meant that the degree to which the defendant would be liable depended on the respective dangerousness of each party’s activity as well as on whether or not one party had behaved negligently. [read post]
9 May 2024, 4:25 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
North Carolina General Statute § 52-13(a) provides that a defendant in such cases cannot be held liable for behavior that occurred after the physical separation of the spouses. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:41 pm
"   The key element to the question as to whether a defendant is liable for induced infringement is infringement - not validity. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 4:15 pm
As reported by Andy Kravetz in the Peoria Journal-Star, the jury deliberated over two days before deciding that defendant Goodyear Dunlop Tires North America Ltd. was liable for the May, 2002, incident on Interstate 55 in Livingston County, Illinois. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 1:45 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Defenders of limited liability reply that it helps the economy by reassuring investors that they cannot lose their life savings merely by buying a single corporate share. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 8:06 am
The person liable for the accident is the defendant, while the person bringing the suit is the plaintiff. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:12 am by The Docket Navigator
The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment of no indirect infringement for the continuing acts of other defendants involving products sold by the moving defendant before it received actual notice. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 4:39 am
Malicious prosecution.Plaintiff was employed by defendant-apartments and, in that capacity, did some maintenance work in individual defendant's unit. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 2:30 pm by Bruce Nye
  The defendant is only liable for these amounts based on his percentage of fault. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 8:53 am by Beck, et al.
We went out of our way to contrast that SDNY decision with the usual doings in the Southern District of Illinois, where too many decisions applied tests that allowed plaintiffs to join local defendants who could never-ever be found liable. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 3:56 pm by The Docket Navigator
In granting defendants' motions for summary judgment of no literal infringement, the court rejected plaintiff's joint infringement theory based on defendants' alleged control of certain third parties. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:24 pm
The Supreme Court’s ruling establishes an even higher pleading bar in private securities fraud cases where the plaintiff wants to hold defendants liable for other’s misstatements. [read post]