Search for: "London v. State" Results 2381 - 2400 of 4,150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Paul Tweed LLP the well known specialist reputation firm in Belfast and London has been bought by listed legal services group Gateley for £2 million. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm by INFORRM
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking Group… [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:25 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has a post entitled “Enhanced Criminal Records Check Mate” concerning the case of R (P & A) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] EWHC 89 (Admin). [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
Resolved cases include: Mr Stephen Wren v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; A man v The Sun (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 11/05/2012; Ms Louise Pyne v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 08/05/2012. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm by Giles Peaker
London Borough of Tower Hamlets v Khan (2022) EWCA Civ 831 contained no suggestion that a money claim might amount to waiver, and Cussens v Realreed Limited (2013) EWHC 1229 suggested that an action for damages (other than non-payment of service charges) could equally found a s.146 notice as well as a declaration of breach. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:42 am
" In Safety National Casualty Corp. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
A London firm has been fined £200,000 after sending over 14.8m spam text messages. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 24 October 2016, Sir David Eady heard an application in the case of Shakil-ur-Rahman v ARY Network Ltd & anr On 25 October 2016, there was an application in the case of ABZ  v Lewisham London Borough Council,  before Warby J. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 2:17 am
Copyright and Artificial Intelligence which will take place on 10 January 2019 in London. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:49 pm
Kelly v Westminster City Council (Central London County Court 14 August 2008). [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:48 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
 That is the issue which the UK Court of Appeal addressed in AES-Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:19 am by Tom Heintzman
 That is the issue which the UK Court of Appeal addressed in AES-Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:20 am by Benjamin Wittes
A similar dynamic occurred in the First Amendment context in 2010’s Holder v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm by Rachit Buch
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
United States NPR reports on the so-called “pink slime” libel case between Beef Products Inc and ABC News will take place in a South Dakota state court this week. [read post]