Search for: "Lovings v. State" Results 2381 - 2400 of 8,289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2017, 7:06 am by LEANNE WOODS, 1 CROWN OFFICE ROW
The PSNI worked on the basis it had no specific power to ban a parade under the 1998 Act (only the Secretary of State could do that) and reached the wrong view that, in the absence of a ban from the Secretary of State or a decision from the Parades Commission, all it could do was rely on general public order policing powers [16]. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:44 pm by admin
” This clause was put to the test in the marriage arena in the 1967 Supreme Court case of Loving v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 7:32 pm by Mila Sohoni
In subsequent years, he explained, the court has sometimes reached the right result while applying this test, for example in cases such as Loving v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:49 am by Rahul Bhagnari
Board of Education, which struck down racial segregation in the public schools in 1954, and Loving v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 4:05 am
At MassTortDefense we love talking about defense wins, and especially love posting about early wins. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 8:08 am by Martha Ertman
 Likewise, the 1879 Supreme Court case Reynolds v. [read post]
The case that was previously posted on and that is currently under review by the California Supreme Court is People v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 12:37 pm
I would love to know what the inside story is behind this startling aboutface in the Court’s conservative tack. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 9:55 am
   For more information please refer to the United States Supreme Court Opinion: Wyeth v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 1:38 am
Supreme Court is considering the case of Baze v. [read post]