Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B" Results 2381 - 2400 of 3,062
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2015, 12:57 am by INFORRM
It is worth recalling exactly what Eady J said: “A search engine, however, is a different kind of Internet intermediary. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) Procureur général du Canada c. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Others have gone down this dubious path before, but these authors’ embrace of the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ opinion in Bendectin litigation reveals the insubstantiality and the invalidity of their method.[18] As Professor Ronald Allen put the matter: “Given the weight of evidence in favor of Bendectin’s safety, it seems peculiar to argue for mosaic evidence [WOE] from a case in which it would have plainly been misleading. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 6:11 am by Scarlet Kim, Paulina Perlin
” (Annex C to the document—“Details of UKUSA Division of Effort”—may offer further details on how DOEs are concluded and what they cover but is entirely redacted.) [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am by Michael Lowe
(c) In this article, “peace officer” means a person listed in Article 2.12, and “special investigator” means a person listed in Article 2.122. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:54 am
.  A2190 Bacalles -- Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided by the county or city of New York to such non-indigent prisoners while in prisonSUMM : Amd SS500-h, 500-n & 508, Cor L Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided to them by the county or city of New York while such non-indigent prisoners are in prison. 01/16/07 referred to correction LAW / CORRECTNSA2228 Lafayette (MS) -- Provides for the… [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 10:49 am
The court of appeals held that attorneys' fees were recoverable under the declaratory judgment act and did not address the alternative bases of recovery, TBCA art. 5.14(j) (for the derivative actions) and TBCA art. 2.44(B), (D) (for violation of inspection rights). [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 4:28 am
As a matter of substantive law, medical monitoring is really controversial. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Those elements motivate core differences in the Court’s interpretive debates over fundamental privileges versus promises, textualism versus purposivism, status quo-preserving originalism vs. rights-promoting pragmatism.[4] I aim to explore those elements with an eye to the plurality of opinions that emerge from shared legal texts, now that stare decisis is in question as a way to settle them and now that interpretations of history and tradition matter a lot toward the same end. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As a result, only the provisions of the EPC 1973 are applied.Computation of the beginning and the end of the TFO[4] In agreement with the parties the Board of appeal bases its considerations on the following factual situation: The wording of claim 1 according to the decision to grant a patent of October 26, 2006, comprised three parallel alternatives A, B, and C, whereas the wording of claim 1 of the patent specification in the relevant German version only contained the… [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:24 am by Ashley Morgan
Law Enforcement Has Initiated Medicare Audits of Amniotic Liquid / Amniotic Tissue / Skin Substitute / Wound Care Claims: UPIC Audits of Original Medicare Part B Amniotic Tissue / Skin Substitute / Wound Care Claims. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
In addition to the law professors, Peter B. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
" [18] In strict liability claims, the degree of care taken by the defendant is immaterial, all that generally matters is that they sold or distributed the product and if they did, liability attaches if the product causes a harm. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 6:48 pm
  Canada submits two "non-papers" on Institutional arrangements (Chapter 4 of ACTA) and procedural matters. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
A, s. 4 (b): Rule 20-5 – Persons Who Are Impoverished Court may determine indigent status (1) If the court… finds that a person receives benefits under the Employment and Assistance Act or the Employment and Assistance for Persons with Disabilities Act or is otherwise impoverished, the court may order that no fee is payable by the person to the government under Schedule 1 of Appendix C in relation to the proceeding… The trial judge found that, although the… [read post]