Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 3,062
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2011, 1:46 pm
Words matter. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:49 am
Thomas Metier and Patrick J. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:09 am
Clause 2(2) says that in determining whether the defendant acted responsibly, the matters which the court may have regard to include” (a) the nature of the publication and its context; (b) the seriousness of any imputation about the claimant that is conveyed by the statement; (c) the extent to which the subject matter of the statement is of public interest; (d) the information the defendant had before publishing the statement and what… [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
The opponent was represented by Mr C. of a Paris law firm. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 3:33 pm
Judicial Notice — excerpts from Better Living Through Judicial Notice, by Paul J. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:10 pm
(c) Articles other than food that are intended to affect the structure or function of the human body. 9. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
In this regard the Board points out that this wording of R 36(1) EPC is identical to the wording of the former R 25(1) EPC 1973 and, therefore, the corresponding case law can be taken into account.[6] The present Board agrees with the statement of the Legal Board of Appeal in decision J 18/04 that the term “pending earlier European patent application” in R 25 EPC 1973 did not establish a time limit having a point in time at which the pending status of an application begins and… [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:38 pm
(b) Table of Contents- The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 5:03 am
Thus we find ourselves looking at the Opinion of Advocate General Niilo Jääskinen in Case C? [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
by Philip J. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:05 am
(Update 2: John Bellinger, who knows this matter better than anyone (possibly excepting Matt Waxman), has a must-read post on the Obama administration’s international law framework in the “fact sheet” at Lawfare. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
ICBC, 2005 BCSC 602; c. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm
Germany (2005) 43 EHRR 96, at [74]; (b) the “additional subjective element [that] they have not validly consented to the confinement in question”: the Storck case, also at [74]; and (c) the confinement must be “imputable to the State”: the Storck case, at [89]. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:06 am
Despite his misgivings about adjudicating on so incomplete a matter Munby J provides a very welcome and illuminating analysis of the fraught issue of religious belief and discrimination. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:44 pm
J. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:44 pm
J. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 7:13 am
The defence is then required to respond to the plaintiff’s case, including leading evidence on any matters on which it carries the burden. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 10:49 pm
If the Governor transgressed his jurisdiction in exercising the said power,c. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
which, though adding nothing, would be enough to take the copied matter outside the claim, and hence outside the reach of law. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:10 pm
C. [read post]
