Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 9,188
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2024, 10:35 pm
The Court also rejected the EUIPO’s argument that, if Indo’s opposition were successful, the opposed mark could be converted into national applications in all (remaining) EU Member States. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:08 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 8:37 am
Facts: This case (US v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:04 pm
By Peter Montine The case of United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 8:58 am
Unfortunately, automobile accidents injure a number of children in Florida and throughout the United States each year. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 4:05 pm
Mark Alembik) for malpractice. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 8:58 am
Unfortunately, automobile accidents injure a number of children in Florida and throughout the United States each year. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
On Wednesday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit narrowed the order of U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:17 pm
In the face of a similar First Amendment challenge, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in U.S. v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:00 pm
Baby L is a citizen of the United States and the United Kingdom. [read post]
31 May 2016, 9:52 am
Star Borough v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
United States, in which the court ruled 5-4 that stock options are not taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 3:45 am
” At Slate, Mark Joseph Stern looks at Monday’s cert grant in Gundy v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 7:23 am
In 1993, Horphag was granted the United States trademark for the mark Pycnogenol. [read post]
18 Nov 2017, 2:11 pm
In 2002, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 7:31 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Judge Baer) held that these claims were precluded under Morrison because the plaintiffs’ transactions were the functional equivalent of transactions in VW stock, which was not traded in the United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 7:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 4:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
