Search for: "Michigan v. United States"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 3,728
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2007, 9:53 am
., United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 9:05 am
v=DO4J_PC1b5M and learn more at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/20/travel/detroit-michigan-downtown.html. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:52 pm
That’s why I was pleased to see a passionate, though short, dissent in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:21 am
’ ” United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 9:14 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 11:16 am
This ongoing, thoughtful process contributed not only to the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision striking down Section 3 of DOMA in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 10:18 pm
S. 133, 136 (1955); see United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu)State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu)Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late 9th to the 14th… [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:36 pm
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
Docket: 08-1459 Title: Michigan v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 6:53 am
” United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
State legislatures have discretion to set tax and spending priorities, the Supreme Court said in 1977 in United States Trust Co. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
United States, protecting a cell phone company’s data storage of consumers’ cell-site location information, poses a potential limit on these protections. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 10:59 am
Note that United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
Maydak, Opposition No. 91153172 (April 4, 2008) [precedential].Dodge DartApplicant Maydak appealed the adverse ruling of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, arguing, inter alia, that the injunction was overly broad. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:52 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 12:54 pm
Berrien County, Michigan 22-766Issue: Whether petitioner’s 42 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision relating to the intersection between trade secret law and patent law: Atlantic Research Marketing Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
