Search for: "Mines v. State" Results 2381 - 2400 of 3,507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2011, 5:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
First, the court must deter- mine whether, at the time of patent filing, the inventor possessed a best mode of practicing the claimed invention. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:55 am by Margaret Wood
  This doctrine was established in the 1920 United States Supreme Court case Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:56 am by Russ Bensing
The appellate panel’s response in State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:00 am
Another, indirect, pathway focuses on the support of key stakeholders to whom human rights related work has been given (by the state) or taken (in the absence of delegation). [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 11:28 pm
Art. 12(4) of the Indo-China DTAA defines “fees for technical services” as “any payment for the provision of services of managerial, technical or consultancy nature by a resident of a Contracting State in the other Contracting State…” [emphasis mine] Art. 12(6), the deeming provision, provides that “royalties or fees for technical services shall be deemed to arise in a Contracting State when the payer is … a resident of… [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 11:30 am by Susan Brenner
Romero-Lopez, supra (quoting Int’l Union, United Mine Workers v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:50 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
Years ago, a law clerk of mine had an unexpected opportunity to clerk for Judge Tatel following his year with me. [read post]