Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 2381 - 2400 of 4,554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2015, 6:54 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
(This is distinct from civil rights cases, where the plaintiff's lawyer recovers fees as a matter of course if plaintiff wins the case).The case is Padula v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 12:19 pm
This morning, the Sixth Circuit handed down a new case, United States v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Supreme Court recently heard argument in Glossip v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 7:06 am by Joy Waltemath
Given the uncertainty as to their precise regular rates, the court found that a conservative estimate, such as the $15 per hour approximation, was justified. [read post]
14 May 2015, 11:55 am by Peter Margulies
This is precisely where use restrictions ought to matter—or should have, anyway. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
  Then we find this:Regulatory status does not provide a clear line between standard and innovative uses of medical products. [read post]
14 May 2015, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
In Sanofi v Apotex 2013 FCA 186 (Plavix/clopidogrel)[5], the appellate court defined “The Promise” as “the standard against which the utility of the invention described in the patent is measured”. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:58 am
  Such orders are named for a 1986 New Jersey case, Lore v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:29 am by Brendan Kevenides
 Sadly, however, the dangerous grate remains in precisely the same condition now as it was in 2006 and 2011. [read post]