Search for: "Patrick v. Patrick" Results 2381 - 2400 of 3,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2010, 2:40 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
Please contact the conference organiser, Aniceto Masferrer (Aniceto.Masferrer@uv.es), or one of the other members of the ESCLH Executive for the programme or for registration and accommodation information: • Dr Seán Patrick Donlan (Limerick): sean.donlan@ul.ie • Professor Jan Hallebeek (VU University Amsterdam): j.j.hallebeek@rechten.vu.nl • Professor Dirk Heirbaut (Ghent): dirk.heirbaut@UGent.be • Professor Aniceto Masferrer (Valencia):… [read post]
In the amicus brief, we urged the Third District to join the other districts in the state and issue an opinion formally adopting the framework for awarding attorney fees set out by the Supreme Court in Hensley v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:28 am by Michael Cannan
Case Information: Ana Reyna, individually and as successor-in-interest to the Estate of Shaun Reyna; Brandi Reyna; Brandon Reyna v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:46 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
Please contact the conference organiser, Aniceto Masferrer (Aniceto.Masferrer@uv.es), or one of the other members of the ESCLH Executive for the programme or for registration and accommodation information: • Dr Seán Patrick Donlan (Limerick): sean.donlan@ul.ie • Professor Jan Hallebeek (VU University Amsterdam): j.j.hallebeek@rechten.vu.nl • Professor Dirk Heirbaut (Ghent): dirk.heirbaut@UGent.be • Professor Aniceto Masferrer (Valencia): Aniceto.Masferrer@uv.es… [read post]
22 May 2023, 3:52 pm by Josh Blackman
Brown's most high-profile case was Feds for Medical Freedom v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:55 am by Adam Chandler
”  Kerr analyzes the reply brief in one such case—City of Ontario v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:00 am by Jon Tracy
 U.S. v Averette (1970) significantly changed its applicability, as the Court of Military Appeals decided that the UCMJ only applied to civilians in times of formally declared war. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:34 am by Chris Seaton
So the Tennessee Supreme Court is really interested in making sure the mandate of Gideon v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:41 pm by Betsy McKenzie
This is a short editorial on the Supreme Court hearing the gun control case, McDonald v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 6:31 am
Doolittle, pro se.Representing Appellee for case 06-86: Patrick J. [read post]