Search for: "People v Weeks"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 15,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2010, 6:28 am
The Utah Supreme Court this week held that electronic signatures gathered through a web site were valid signatures for the purpose of nominating a person to run for elected office: Anderson v Bell 2010 UT 47 June 22, 2010. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 8:16 pm
Virginia v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 1:16 am
Turner v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:54 am
The podcast was inspired by the Illinois criminal court case People v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 10:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Wailes v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 2:50 am
Trump’s tough talk with Iran comes as he continues to face fierce criticism over his meeting last week with President Vladimir V. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 4:15 am
The complaint (full text) in Apache Stronghold v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 3:58 am
Gore decision was the one decision most people had asked him about. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:32 am
A post last week mentioned Ireland’s highest ever award of defamation damages – €10 million in Kinsella v Kenmare Resources. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: EU member states sign agreement in principle on establishing single EU patent (Managing IP) (IAM) (Blog@IPJUR.com) (IPKat) Global Global - General IP valuation – keep it simple, focus instead on creating value (IP Think Tank) WTO ends ministerial with no agreements and modest treatment of IP (IP Watch)… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:19 pm
Sterling access to the evidence which, when eventually obtained, helped prove his innocence.So it was kind of shocking to see that in People v Woodrich (4th dept 9/30/11) the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, cited its decision in Sterling as the authority for rejection another inmates' motion for DNA testing:County Court properly denied the motion “because defendant failed to establish that there was a reasonable probability that, had those items been tested… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:19 pm
Sterling access to the evidence which, when eventually obtained, helped prove his innocence.So it was kind of shocking to see that in People v Woodrich (4th dept 9/30/11) the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, cited its decision in Sterling as the authority for rejection another inmates' motion for DNA testing:County Court properly denied the motion “because defendant failed to establish that there was a reasonable probability that, had those items been tested [further] and… [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 8:27 am
Today we commemorate the 47th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 7:23 pm
As we meet for these pretrial proceedings in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:00 am
On March 21, 2012, the court in People v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
The UCLA First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic submitted a brief in an interesting New Jersey trial court case a few weeks ago (Petro-Lubricant Testing Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 8:23 am
(Notably, last week another member of the Council met with ICC Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo at the court's Hague headquarters, above right. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
He regularly misidentified people, was delusional, and was sometimes disoriented. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:12 pm
Student B stops for about a week. [read post]
