Search for: "People v. Smith"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 3,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Matt Bodie considers how the decision in Harris might play out if, as many people believe, Justice Samuel A. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:35 pm
In Harris and Smith counties, more than two-thirds were under $5,000. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 8:47 am
These are basically the facts of NAACP v. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
If Special Counsel Smith can prove that Trump and one or more other people conspired to block the counting of ballots, that could serve as a stand-alone Section 241 charge in an indictment. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
The Guardian covers the latest delays in the defamation trial between ex-soldier Ben Roberts-Smith and the Age, Canberra Times and Sydney Morning Herald over allegations that he committed war crimes while on tour in Afghanistan. [read post]
Can fishermen be required to pay for federal monitors? And by the way – should Chevron be overruled?
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am
Enough people think this case may have legs that a whopping fourteen amicus briefs were filed supporting the petition. [read post]
11 Jan 2025, 8:36 am
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
On the same day Bean J heard the “offer of amends” case of KC v MGN Ltd – a claim by the natural father of “Baby P” wrongly accused in The People of being a sex offender convicted of raping a 14-year-old girl. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
The company says it will now make changes to the service, which lets IT administrators “help their people get the most” from its products, in order to limit the amount of information about individual employees that is shared with managers. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 12:36 pm
According to Cohen v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:31 am
See Cohen v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 10:32 am
The Supreme Court is considering whether to overrule Smith this term in Fulton v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
Supreme Court decision in Berghuis v Smith. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:30 am
The first two articles are from quite possibly the most authoritative people who could speak about the Yearbook—i.e., the President and Deputy President of the UK Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 9:16 am
Philips v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Smith, No. 06-3112 In a case addressing the constitutionality of a vehicle impoundment under the Fourth Amendment in circumstances in which there was no standardized policy regarding the impoundment and towing of vehicles, the circuit court rules that the constitutionality of a community caretaking impoundment is judged by directly applying the Fourth Amendment, which protects people against "unreasonable" searches and seizures. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
Tobacco Tax Differentials Incentivize Smuggling People respond to incentives. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 3:46 am
Especially when you can come up with one like this for the case of Washington v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
