Search for: "People v. Tooks" Results 2381 - 2400 of 12,211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2017, 5:00 am by John Jascob
As the promissory notes did not meet either the risk-capital or the Howey test for a security, the trial court properly set aside two criminal charges that the defendant used false statements in the sale of a security (People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Mark Methenitis
But as sales increased and the market expanded, small and significant debates took place. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 5:05 am by Dean Freeman
The Journal is a decidedly pro-business publication, and took the tack that this series of events was a bad thing. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 8:46 am by Kalvis Golde
The day’s sole argument turned out to be Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 7:54 am by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: 1.7 Million Jury Verdict Awarded to Driver for Injury Suffered After Rear-End by 18-Wheeler Truck – Kolodzik v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 10:49 pm
You can get all the details here.Another case the IPKat reviewed earlier this year is Daimler v Sany, in which Daimler sued Sany for trade mark infringement and passing off, claiming that Sany's device mark (right) caused confusion with and took unfair advantage of, or caused detriment to the well-known Mercedes Benz figurative mark (below left). [read post]