Search for: "Phillips v. Phillips"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 3,829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2013, 10:02 am
PHILLIPS, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A PHILLIPS OIL INTERESTS, LLC, ET AL. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 4:11 am
’” Id., at *5 (quoting Phillips Petroleum Co. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 9:34 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Today’s live blog team comprises Emma Cross (Olswang), Matt Clark (CMS), Byron Phillips (Nabarro), Rachel Wilson (Olswang), Clementine Bottet (Nabarro) & Jessica Foley (CMS). 16:30: The court has adjourned for the day. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:18 am
I am not aware of a North Carolina case directly on point, but the court of appeals came quite close to ruling that spitting is an assault in Phillips v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:18 am
I am not aware of a North Carolina case directly on point, but the court of appeals came quite close to ruling that spitting is an assault in Phillips v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 7:03 am
Curtis’ behalf (the Tabak and Phillip cases). [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:10 am
Starting on Wednesday 23 November 2011 is the two day hearing of Sugar (Deceased) (Represented by Fiona Paveley) v BBC, which on appeal from the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) and will be heard by Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown, Mance and Dyson. [read post]
25 May 2014, 12:23 pm
The parties are free, however, to agree to different terms triggering a change in the obligations of the payor spouse, including the application of a standard other than substantial unanticipated and unreasonable change in circumstances as the basis for determining a modification application, provided that, in the case of child support, the children's personal right to receive adequate support is not adversely affected and public policy is not offended based on Heller v Heller, Matter… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:30 am
Becker v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:34 am
Lord Phillips gives the lead judgment. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:22 am
To my mind, the case is really a follow-up to Atwater v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Helm v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
On Monday 28 and Tuesday 29 November 2011 the Court of Appeal (Lord Judge LCJ, Lord Neuberger MR and Maurice Kay LJ) heard the appeals in Phillips v NGN and Coogan v NGN against orders of Mr Justice Vos in phone hacking claims (see [2011] EWHC 349 (Ch)). [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Peter Phillips is here) In Theriault v. [read post]
News: Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications, Final Submissions in Federal Treasurer’s defamation trial
18 Mar 2015, 1:31 am
For the respondents: Dr Matthew Collins QC and Sandy Dawson instructed By Leanne Norman and Phillip Beattie of Banki Haddock Fiora and Gail Hambly and Richard Coleman (Fairfax Media). [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 11:15 am
” The Federal Circuit noted that they were applying the Phillips claim construction standard – whereby “[t]he words of a claim are generally given their ordinary and customary meaning as understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art when read in the context of the specification and prosecution history. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:15 am
Three justices (you need four for an outright majority) agreed in a concurring opinion in Phillips v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
In Gill v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 4:50 am
However, the violation of a disciplinary rule or ethical obligations does not, without more, generate a cause of action for legal malpractice (Guiles v Simser, 35 AD3d 1054, 1056 [2006]; Weintraub v Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim, & Ballon, 172 AD2d 254 [1991]). [read post]
