Search for: "RT"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 4,052
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
(RT: May be another reason to endorse algorithmic approach approved by the court in Lenz: makes more clear that © notice and takedown is a poor model for other types of content, which can’t be determined in an alg [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am
RT: Relevant, but normative issues remain about interpreting things like usage versus comprehension and whether de facto secondary meaning is a thing. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm
RT: But can you really train consumers? [read post]
1 May 2016, 7:32 am
RT: Three things: (1) In re Tam: that is dependent on Reed and is a commercial speech case despite claims to the contrary; to see that it is, look at why the majority says it’s ok to uphold the bars against deceptive and confusing marks while striking down disparagement: b/c Central Hudson says misleading commercial speech can be banned entirely. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm
Ann Schlosser (University of Washington, Michael G. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:25 am
RT: Relationship between core and non-core and presence of other claims? [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:51 pm
RT, OTW: Who’s the game-changing musician of our generation, asked in the last panel? [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:36 am
Moderator – Meredith Jacob, American University Washington College of Law Jhessica Reia, Center for Technology and Society at Fundacao Getulio Vargas (CTS-FGV) – DIY or Die! [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:50 am
(RT: Note the implicit assumption that there is a fixed pool of creators who create stuff, and users who consume stuff, and never the twain shall meet, certainly not at the point of fair use. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 11:11 am
RT: Traditional, reasonable, or likely to be developed is important constraint, and traditional/reasonable behavior here was something jury heard testimony on. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 11:38 am
(RT: why I call the DMCA the Digital Fifteen Minutes Copyright Act.) [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm
RT: Compare reasoning in Disney case: if you actually retaliate for Disney’s speech, there’s no claim. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 12:52 pm
AVVO.com is a magnificent resource. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:18 pm
Let u ... about 1 month ago bankruptcyphx: RT @AlmostSavvy: A peek behind the Almost Savvy curtain. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 12:52 am
Dorsey Henderson.The Rt. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 3:58 am
Kemal KILIÃâ [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:47 am
Cardozo Law Conference: New Impressions of Advertising Law Panel 1: False Advertising (herein of Pom Wonderful v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm
RT: Why is the paper about “IP” and not patent & © with a trade secret chaser? [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 2:51 pm
(RT: Joe Liu has an excellent article on this.)Q: you say you want narrower rules and more rapid decisionmaking. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 7:11 am
RT: Perhaps if these distinctions are too difficult for philosophers they are definitely too difficult for courts and we should start looking for harm causation + falsity anywhere in the chain. [read post]
