Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 14,160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
Nixon then ordered the next in command at DOJ, Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus, to fire Cox. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:27 am
Moreover, to the extent the plaintiff alleged that Navins gave false testimony as a witness in a criminal case against him, such an allegation cannot properly form the basis of a Judiciary Law § 487 cause of action (see generally Altman v DiPreta, 204 AD3d 965, 969). [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:13 am
In Jackson Walker L.L.P. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 12:54 pm
Harris v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:31 pm
Continue reading → The post Important Texas Oil & Gas Case – Roland Oil Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 4:45 am
One thing that has not changed is the legislated and litigated bar of privity and some wholesale bans on suing attorneys, Klingsberg v Council of Sch. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:43 am
Leeder v Antonucci, 195 AD3d 1592, 1593 [4th Dept 2021]; see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). [read post]
14 May 2015, 10:26 am
It’s important for DUI defense attorneys to challenge both kinds of evidence wherever possible, but circumstantial evidence is generally more ripe for this. [read post]
14 May 2015, 10:26 am
It’s important for DUI defense attorneys to challenge both kinds of evidence wherever possible, but circumstantial evidence is generally more ripe for this. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:11 pm
(If you are generally interested in state-action immunity from antitrust, I also filed an amicus brief in the US Supreme Court’s other recent antitrust case, FTC v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 8:13 am
In Ping v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:43 pm
The answer is generally no. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:25 am
Generally, you do not have the same privacy rights in a car that you would in your home. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 4:11 pm
Carpenter is whether a district court decision finding waiver of the attorney-client privilege is immediately appealable under the so-called collateral order doctrine that the Supreme Court has read into 28 U.S.C. 1291 in a series of cases dating back to Cohen v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 7:22 am
Next week, the argument in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 12:40 pm
In No. 07-1315, Knowles v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 6:30 am
It is hoped that the Attorney General will provide clarification around this issue. 3. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 6:30 am
It is hoped that the Attorney General will provide clarification around this issue. 3. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 8:46 pm
Check the Bloate v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 1:39 pm
Sojitz Energy Venture, Inc. v. [read post]
