Search for: "Shields v. Shields"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 6,244
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2011, 7:14 pm
But recently the Court of Appeals in San Marco v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 7:21 am
Specifically, in Convertino v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:09 am
Cooper v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:43 am
In the case, McFarlin v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 3:02 am
Initially the subpoena was quashed upon the ground that it sought material shielded from disclosure by the physician-patient privilege.* The Court of Appeals, however, ruled that the records sought were not properly withheld from the Commission by reason of the alleged physician-patient privilege and that the subpoena should be honored. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:50 am
A flaw in the project will not prevent it from being substantially complete for statute of repose purposes, as recently demonstrated in the case of Raby v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Disciplinary charges filed in an earlier disciplinary action in which the employee was found not guilty considered in a subsequent disciplinary actionHoffmann v Department of Educ. of City of N.Y., 2004 NY Slip Op 51952(U), Supreme Court, Kings County, not officially reported, Affd., 21 A.D.3d 493Education Law § 3020-a (4) (b) requires that charges of which the employee has been acquitted be expunged from his or her "personnel records. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 11:31 am
In Jerman v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:43 am
In the case, McFarlin v. [read post]
20 Sep 2006, 6:13 am
As a follow up to Don Brenner's earlier post on the recent Appellate Division decision in Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
However, the issue has been muddled in Michigan, where the Court of Appeals had to take on the issue in Michigan v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
See Briarpatch Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:41 am
Microsoft Corporation and Sun-Rype Products v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:51 am
See Briarpatch Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 2:22 am
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., 19 F.3d 562, 566-67 (11th Cir.1994)); see also United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 2:55 pm
After Monday's argument in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
But, even absent enforcement legislation, Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment can be wielded as a shield as a set of defenses. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 2:32 pm
The Shield Act (stands for Saving High-Tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes) claims to be a solution to this. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 8:12 am
This closely resembles Article 8(1) ECHR which provides that restrictions on the right to privacy must be "in accordance with the law" - a formula which has been used by the ECtHR in cases from Klass v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:53 pm
Privacy Shield Framework. [read post]
