Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 4,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
This motion to put the entire case on hold will be based on a decision by the Central Reexamination Division of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to reject all claims of U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:47 am
The Court of Appeals agreed with the Appellate Division decision below that PL265.03(3) creates an exception to the home or business exception. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:39 am
Notes for--Planned Parenthood of SE PA v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 5:40 am
Sept 19, 2012) [I]t is clear to this Court that the plaintiffs are prepared to "try this case in the press," and since this involves the entity responsible for protecting the safety and property of the citizens of this division, this Court cannot allow that to happen. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
The Opposition Division dismissed the opposition based on Article 8(5) too, since Elmar Wolf had not adduced evidence of any detriment to the repute of the earlier marks or any unfair advantage gained from them.... and another one Elmar Wolf's appeal to the Second Board of Appeal was more successful: the Board found that the earlier marks were highly reputed in three Member States, that there was some similarity between the marks at issue and that the relevant… [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:42 pm
The case went up to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, which issued what is still the best opinion in favor of these constitutional arguments, Glik v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 10:20 am
In Bracking & Ors v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1345 the Court of Appeal upheld a challenge to the Government’s decision to abolish the Independent Living Fund for disabled people. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:07 am
The court’s citation to Leibert v. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:03 pm
” That was not all of what the Court had said in the Marsh v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:34 am
The Court declined to follow Shaw Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 3:47 pm
The Court of Appeals, New York's highest court, agreed with that finding. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
” My opponent and I quickly settled the case. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
--Marvin v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
Equally fortunately, I can confidently state that none of the programs we will be discussing today were within my purview when I was at the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:52 pm
The Henderson v Henderson rule did not apply for two reasons. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 6:41 am
Mom appealed. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
When last I wrote about those suits, Cooper and Godfread removed the Illinois cases to the United States District Courts in the Northern and Southern Districts of Ill [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:13 am
Appealing as the summit is, I will be unable to attend. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 8:21 am
Husband, on the other hand, contests the district court’s division of the parties’ property.Issues: Wife presents the following issues on appeal: I. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
McAdams resulted in one of the nine published post-Tobacco II appellate opinions, in which the Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's order denying class certification. [read post]
