Search for: "State v. Dominic" Results 2381 - 2400 of 4,510
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
  These questions, among others, find a response in yesterday's judgment of High Court for England and Wales, Chancery Division, ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK and Another[2015] EWHC 17 (Ch).BackgroundEnterprise and Europcar are two heavyweights of the car rental market. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 6:04 am by Florian Mueller
Two days later, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit will finally hold its postponed (due to Hurricane Ida) hearing in Continental v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:20 am by Michael C. Dorf
As CJ Roberts wrote for the Court last Term in West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 12:52 am by Florian Mueller
This morning I found out I had actually missed the funniest piece of evidence in that whole Oracle v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Further, state law could allow a corporation to indemnify a director or officer. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:00 pm by Charlie Dunlap
Still, there can be little doubt that it will constitute a very significant state-centered document that will serve as a much-needed counterpoint to nongovernmental organizations, academics, and others who have in recent years come to dominate the dialogue about the law of war. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 9:55 am by David Post
Gill, as most of you are probably aware, involves a challenge to the Republican-dominated Wisconsin legislature’s 2011 redistricting map, a map that, according to the three-judge panel below, was both intended to, and did, systematically disadvantage Democratic voters and advantage Republican voters across the state. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 5:00 am by Ryan Scoville
Note, moreover, that language deficiencies tend to affect some receiving states much more than others. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 12:09 am by Xandra Kramer
They assert that Apple’s dominant position in the market and its behavior constitute an abuse of power. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Starbucks' NOW logoIn this appeal to the Supreme Court, Starbucks (HK), who are broadcasters and not baristas, dropped a claim for infringement of a CTM for a device mark dominated by the word "NOW" with minimal graphical embellishment which was ultimately held invalid. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Pennsylvania or Dred Scott, it would also have been helpful to include some relevant cases from northern states, such as  licensing Roberts v. [read post]