Search for: "State v. Harris" Results 2381 - 2400 of 5,249
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg had the Court’s decision in the bankruptcy case Harris v Viegelahn. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 6:30 am
Harris County Toll Road Authority, No. 06-0933 State Farm Lloyds v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:00 am by Amy Howe
” ACSblog’s series of posts on Harris v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Prince Harry said in a statement: “I lost my mother and now I watch my wife falling victim to the same powerful forces. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(Baccash v Sayegh, 53 AD3d at 639 [quoting Harris v Stony Clove Lake Acres, 202 AD2d 745, 747 (3d Dept 1994)].) [*5] The caselaw cited above appears to consider the issue in terms of both "standing to sue" (New Castle Siding Co., Inc. v Wolfson, 97 AD2d at 502) and "having a cause of action" (id.) . [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 12:03 am by Jeff Gamso
 When Harry Blackmun announced his opposition in Callins v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:50 am by Jonathan Macey
  So it was fun to see the oral argument before the Court in Gabelli v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 6:36 am by Ronald Mann
Indeed, the Justices face that fact pattern three times this month (earlier this week in Caulkett and next Wednesday in this case and Harris v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:04 pm by Walter Olson
Minimum wage laws are sentimental legislation with all-too-real effects [Jeffrey Dorfman] “Our Business’s Response to California $2 Minimum Wage Increase” [Coyote, with more on a union angle on minimum wage laws] Some experience from Europe [Steve Hanke, more, Cato overview of minimum wage debate] Connecticut fires state labor department employee who gamed system to get benefits for friend, then reinstates after grievance [Raising Hale] Oldie but goodie: union… [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 2:47 am by jonathanturley
In 2008, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:05 am
The Commonwealth further stated that its protocol would not violate [Gelfgatt’s] rights under . . . the 5h Amendment to the United States Constitution. . . . [read post]