Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 2381 - 2400 of 7,193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2019, 12:31 pm by MOTP
("Thus, we join our sister courts in holding that account stated, and not a suit on a sworn account, is a proper cause of action for a credit card collection suit because no title to personal property or services passes from the bank to the credit card holder. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 12:00 am by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in North Olmsted, Ohio, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:37 am by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Medina, OH, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:26 pm by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Fostoria Ohio, his application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 9:12 pm by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Chicago, IL, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 5:21 am by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Cleveland, Ohio, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 8:17 am by Giorgio Luceri
., colour marks and 3D marks) (MHCS v EUIPO | Case T-274/20 and Guerlain v EUIPO | Case T-488/20), the risks of using a mark in a manner other than that registered (Fashioneast Sàrl v EUIPO | Case T-297/20) and taking unfair advantage of the reputation of a well-known mark (Asolo Ltd. v EUIPO | Case T-509/19) and the importance of presenting valid arguments for the existence of a link between the marks - even in the case of marks with an exceptional… [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 6:25 pm by Mark Latham
ShareThe Supreme Court held 5-4 in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 7:00 am by Jacob Sapochnick
While the V visa is currently available only to spouses and minor children of green card holders. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 5:31 am by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Havertown, PA, his application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:05 am by David Markus
Archer, 531 F.3d 1347, 1352 (11th Cir. 2008), and United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:12 am by David Gans
More than a week after oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]