Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2017, 4:36 pm
Reports stating that the case had concluded therefore appeared, naming the parties and myself. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 7:50 pm
Bell v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 12:10 am
Yesterday’s decision in MGN v United Kingdom (Case No. 39401/04) has become the most discussed media law case of the year so far. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am
Freedom of Information Information Commissioner Christopher Graham has submitted evidence to Lord Burns’ Independent Commission on Freedom of Information. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:19 am
Significantly, the Committee did not consider issues of substantive law: as Lord Neuberger stated in the Forward, this would have been ‘inappropriate’. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:59 am
Its earlier quotation from Buckley v UK would seem to intimate so. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
Dicta in Regina v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
Sporrong [Sporrong and Lönnroth v Sweden (1983) 5 EHRR 35] itself) that the presence or absence of compensation is not a separate issue, but is an important element in deciding whether, in authorising the interference in the general interest, the balance struck by the state is fair. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
Sporrong [Sporrong and Lönnroth v Sweden (1983) 5 EHRR 35] itself) that the presence or absence of compensation is not a separate issue, but is an important element in deciding whether, in authorising the interference in the general interest, the balance struck by the state is fair. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
New Brunswick Teachers’ Assn., 2001 NBCA 62, which adopted the following reasons of Lord Denning in London Artists Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:43 am
Update | Thomas v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
Kerr stated in her factum, the “approach enunciated in Pettkus v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:23 am
The Government of the United States of America v Richard O’Dwyer. [read post]
2 May 2018, 11:16 pm
" (Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
Assocs., 182 N.J. 210, 225 (2005) (quoting 23 Williston on Contracts § 63:22, at 513-14 (Lord ed. 2002)). [read post]
4 May 2010, 9:04 pm
If the answer was yes, then the second issue was whether Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No.3) [2009] UKHL 28 applies in this context so as to require the Home Office to provide a gist of the closed material upon which it seeks to rely to the employee and his legal representatives. [read post]
27 Apr 2025, 12:03 am
On behalf of the Government, Lord Hanson of Flint, Minister of State at the Home Office, replied: “I am grateful to the right reverend Prelate for his approach to the issue. [read post]
9 Feb 2025, 7:39 am
The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, now listed as U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:45 am
Lord Justice Laws in the High Court has now rubbished that suggestion, saying: Lord Carey’s observations are misplaced. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
