Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 19,834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
The ruling addresses the notion of "use of trade mark" in on-line advertising and explores possible remedies against trade mark infringements on the internet.* A Monsanto case that could alter the dynamics of technology transfer to IndiaKatfriend Prashant Reddy pens about a wide legal dispute between Monsanto and some Indian seed companies, backed by the Indian government (& state governments). [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:21 am
In Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:42 am
Supreme Court Gow v Grant (Scotland) [2012] UKSC 29 (24 May 2012) Phillips v Mulcaire (Rev 1) [2012] UKSC 28 (24 May 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) G1 v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 867 (04 July 2012) Daejan Properties Ltd v Campbell [2012] EWCA Civ 875 (19 June 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Ampurius NU Homes Holdings Ltd v Telford Homes (Creekside) Ltd [2012] EWHC 1820 (Ch) (04 July 2012) Starbucks… [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:00 am
In Robotti & Co. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:56 am
Expense Bd. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
The trademark owner never takes title to the goods and thus, under the standard stated in Bose, it will not have "use in commerce" of its marks. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:03 am
See Palm Bay Imports, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 11:49 am
in which the General Court stated that the goods can be considered as identical when the goods designated by the earlier mark are included in a more general category designated by the trade mark application or when the goods designated by the trade mark application are included in a more general category designated by the earlier mark. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:24 pm
This morning the Court heard argument in Friedrichs v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:43 pm
Lewin (a/k/a Baehr v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 9:06 am
It was just a few months ago that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (BMB v Ferrero, C‑693/17 P) sided with well-known foodstuffs manufacturer Ferrero by upholding the invalidity of a registered Community design right for comfit boxes and containers pursuant to Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation No 6/2002. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 6:50 am
Ltd. v KRBL Ltd and Anr. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 11:33 am
Mark H. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 11:24 am
In Cullen v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 7:45 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Modhej & Anor, R (On the Applications) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 957 (17 July 2012) Khaira & Ors v Shergill & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 983 (17 July 2012) AB, (A Child), Re [2012] EWCA Civ 978 (17 July 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Red Bull GmbH v Sun Mark Ltd & Anor [2012] EWHC 1929 (Ch) (17 July 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Roberts, R (on the application of)… [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 12:02 am
Lacoste Alligator S.A. v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 11:09 am
Today marks the 53rd anniversary of Brown v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 10:30 am
This marks the most significant among many dates set by the Second Amended Scheduling Order, in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:38 pm
McLelland J. did not state any exhaustive test. [read post]
