Search for: "State v. Masters"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 3,927
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2013, 8:53 am
Several members of the IPKat team have been captivated by the recent case of Nestec SA & Ors v Dualit Ltd & Ors [2013] EWHC 923 (Pat) (22 April 2013), another masterful judgment from Mr Justice Arnold (206 paragraphs, since you ask - rather concise considering the large number of points at issue). [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 2:56 am
| Justice Slade delivers judgement in Arthur J Gallagher Services v Skriptchenko Never too late 99 [week ending on Sunday 5 June] German Constitutional Court sends sampling saga into another loop | Who should pay for the independence of the Boards of Appeal? [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 4:17 pm
State Bar (1991), which are more easily upheld. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:01 pm
Selections are made on an annual, state-by-state basis. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 3:27 am
Weyhrauch v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 8:43 pm
The case is entitled, Purton v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 2:00 pm
., in his February 7, 2014 decision in Zinter v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 11:38 pm
Further arguments on this post can be found by reading my Master thesis. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 4:08 pm
Zahawi v Press TV [2017] EWHC 1010 (QB) (Master McCloud). [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 12:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 12:21 pm
Crooks v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 1:45 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
Roberts stated that he would “discard[]” the “viability line established by Roe” and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PA v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Texas to U.S. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 1:22 pm
See Vallejos v Lan Cargo, SA, 116 So.3d 545 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2013). [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
(Although, in Tutun v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Post’s new book, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921-1930, is the latest installment of the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:47 pm
In Ahmed v Powell [2003] EWHC 9011 (Costs), Master Hurst considered the matter in some detail: “Note 47.14.7 ‘Rights of audience on detailed assessment’ in the White Book is the note referred to by the District Judge at the hearing on 10 July 2002. [read post]
