Search for: "Supreme People's Court Observer"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 2,743
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2009, 9:50 pm
Ashabi et al, this Court upheld the trial judge's decision finding negligence, a decision which referenced Fontaine, stating with respect to the trial judge's finding of prima facie negligence that: [7] She first considered whether the prima facie inference of negligence could be… [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 1:20 pm
Prior to 1978, credit reporting was in its infancy, and the Supreme Court had not yet handed down its decision in Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
As you can guess from the title, Berger's book was very critical of the Warren court (and its aftermath in the 70s). [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 7:10 am
Caveat emptor—'let the buyer beware. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:15 pm
We had a swell time at the show, met lots of great people, and look forward to next year's show! [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 9:35 am
Should members of Congress argue before the Supreme Court? [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
LVMH sued because of the use of this ';semi-logo'. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:14 pm
In line with the Supreme Court decision, it must be defended on a personal level. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 9:05 am
" Based largely on the Full Faith and Credit Clause, states traditionally have recognized marriages performed in other states.The government's principal argument in defense of DOMA's full faith and credit provision contends that courts have allowed states to deny recognition of marriages from other states that violate their own "public policy. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Nor are we permitted by the Supreme Court to interpret isolated statutory phrases solely according to grammatical diagrams. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:27 pm
However, regarding predisposition, the Supreme Court of the U.S. has observed that law enforcement may not “implant in the mind of a person the disposition to commit the alleged offense and induce its commission in order that they may prosecute”. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:19 am
Then you have judges who think it’s cool to insert pop cultural references in their opinion, like this opinion by the Texas Supreme Court, which quoted from Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
Supreme Court, which tends to be remarkably stingy about both human rights and national powers to promote the general welfare. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 6:58 pm
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments next week, on October 8, in Garland v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 2:22 pm
California, thereby letting stand an appeals court ruling that upheld the bulk of California's sanctuary laws. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 1:36 am
In fact, under the Supreme Court Dastar case, anyone can claim to be the author of non-copyrighted work, such as Shakepeare's Hamlet or the movie "It's a Wonderful Life" without violating federal law. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
(See, e.g., the Gorsuch-not-Garland Supreme Court’s approval of the Muslim travel ban.)Which brings us once again back to my Swedish interlocutor’s question: Isn’t that just democracy? [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:00 am
Supreme Court to review the case. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 12:15 pm
I am pretty well versed on the Illinois Code of Professional Responsibility and the Supreme Court Rules and I've yet to find the provision that says lawyers must wear neckties or wingtips, and my review of the law is that the lawyer's appearance was sufficient, especially in a blizzard and under the conditions noted. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
The Court's decision was, at times, visibly reluctant. [read post]
