Search for: "True v. United States"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 9,164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am
That may well be true. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 4:52 am
Stark in Natera, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:59 am
In Knick v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:07 pm
Review Board, 450 U.S. 707, 713 (1981); United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 6:56 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 1:20 pm
As the Seventh Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 2:30 pm
Hernandez and Little v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 5:04 am
Asset Marketing Inc., No. 05-CV-00633 (S.D.Cal.), filed in March 2005, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, and certified as a state-wide class action (covering a class that “partially overlaps the Negrete class”) in July 2006; Mooney v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:52 am
A Federal court in California has struck down a ban on gay marriage in the state, marking the first step on a path to a United States Supreme Court decision on the issue. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:15 am
[The Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:28 am
See English v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 3:28 am
See English v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:49 pm
United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972) .................. 4 Johnson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm
Where a state breaches the ECHR, a Court set up by signatory members – the European Court of Human Rights (which has nothing to do with the European Union) – can order a state to pay an aggrieved citizen compensation. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 4:48 pm
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
The Fredericksburg Care Company LP v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 11:25 am
The United States argues that the defendant was the true addressee; hence, why isn't that binding on the government, as an admission that the defendant does have standing? [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 6:56 am
United States, No 04-41196 (5th Cir., Oct. 11, 2006). [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:32 am
Romeril v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:36 am
The case is Keiffer v. [read post]