Search for: "US v. Anderson" Results 2381 - 2400 of 2,419
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2007, 4:57 am by Ricky E. Bagolie
Third generation OCs contain desogestrel (available in the US), or gestodene (not available in the US), while second generation OCs contain norgestrel, levonorgestrel, norgestimate[*] , or norethindrone. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
Congress wanted to promote the efficiencies that came with increased use of electronic data management technology in the medical area while preserving patient privacy. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 12:25 pm
  As a result, the District Court turned to the Supreme Court’s decision in Anderson v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 6:02 pm
"[2]  The term "bona fide wellness program" has been repeatedly used in published rules and regulations to refer to programs that will pass muster under the HIPAA exception.[3] In 2001, the Department of Labor, joined by the Treasury and HHS, issued proposed regulations hoping to define "bona fide wellness programs. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 7:16 am
In Anderson, the affidavit indicated that Anderson was trying to sell a particular gun that had been used in a murder, and we concluded that although no specific facts established a direct link between the gun and Anderson's residence, it was reasonable to believe that he was probably keeping the gun in his home. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 7:01 pm
They even know less about the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 6:07 am
Tenneco Resins, Inc., 953 F.2d 909, 912 n.5 (5th Cir. 1992); Anderson v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 8:40 am
Anderson, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Cathleen D. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 7:07 am
Anderson, et al. (06-401), contended that this differing treatment violating the equality of voting principles discussed in Bush v. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 3:31 pm
Yesterday in Child Evangelism Fellowship of South Carolina v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
When I joined Verio, there were about 200 of us. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 4:09 am
Anderson was expediently and at that time perhaps excusably wrong; and the dissenting speech by Lord Atkin was right" (UKHL ITC v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 7:02 am
A new attempt to get the Court to rule further on tuition vouchers that are used at parochial schools failed when the Justices declined review of Anderson v. [read post]