Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 14,190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2024, 9:07 am
In recent years, several states like Arizona[7] and Georgia[8] have passed laws closely cabining the deference afforded to state agencies. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 7:31 am
John Doe #1 et al. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:37 am
R&Q Reinsurance Co. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 1:11 pm
On Valentine’s Day, the plaintiffs in Obergefell, et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 3:09 pm
The novel coronavirus continues to spread across the United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
Take Our Poll (5) United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:30 am
The Press explains:On March 8, 1971, the Supreme Court of the United States decided a case, Griggs v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
DOMA and United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 3:30 am
Along with the previous year’s Ozawa v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:49 pm
Louisa WATTS v the United Kingdom - 53586/09 [2010] ECHR 793 This was the admissibility hearing of a case brought by Yvonne Hossack on the closure of a care home by Wolverhampton BC and transfer of the residents to other care homes. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:49 pm
Louisa WATTS v the United Kingdom - 53586/09 [2010] ECHR 793 This was the admissibility hearing of a case brought by Yvonne Hossack on the closure of a care home by Wolverhampton BC and transfer of the residents to other care homes. [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 7:58 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 4:53 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 8:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:05 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am
United States, in which the court reaffirmed precedent holding that prosecution of the same conduct by separate sovereigns, such as a state and the federal government, does not violate the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause. [read post]
