Search for: "United States v. House" Results 2381 - 2400 of 11,988
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court reaffirmed precedent holding that prosecution of the same conduct by separate sovereigns, such as a state and the federal government, does not violate the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 4:11 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Find all of the latest updates at narf.org/nill/bulletins/ Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2020.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 4:35 pm by Mark Walsh
“It is my duty and my honor on behalf of the people of the United States of America to thank Justice Blackmun for his lifetime of service to our nation. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am by Adam Chandler
United States, released earlier this month. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 4:55 pm by JB
McConnell (who in addition to being a distinguished jurist is also an absolutely first-rate litigator) tries valiantly to make use of an obscure footnote in a 1990 case, United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 8:35 am by Ronald Mann
Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:44 pm by NARF
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act of 1974; Administrative Procedure Act) United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 8:25 pm by Josh Blackman
[That statute disqualifies a person from "holding any office under the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:45 pm by Orin Kerr
But as the Sixth Circuit noted in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm by NL
The letter stated: “You may continue to live in this country and you may exercise your rights as a British Citizen to claim housing benefit to rent a new home for yourself and your family….it is not the purpose of the Housing Act, however, to assist you to enjoy the “benefits of citizenship”.A appealed. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm by NL
The letter stated: “You may continue to live in this country and you may exercise your rights as a British Citizen to claim housing benefit to rent a new home for yourself and your family….it is not the purpose of the Housing Act, however, to assist you to enjoy the “benefits of citizenship”.A appealed. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:56 am by NCC Staff
But perhaps the Chief Justice’s highest-profile case was United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:16 pm by Ben Cheng
Cali)Petition for certiorariBrief of respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives in opposition (forthcoming)Brief of respondent Karen Golinski in support In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]