Search for: "United States v. Peoples" Results 2381 - 2400 of 22,855
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In both Gonzalez and Taamneh, the Solicitor General will also be arguing on behalf of the United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 7:56 am by Phillips & Associates
The United States is, in many ways, still recovering from the economic crisis that began in 2008, with millions of people still unemployed or underemployed. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 2:34 am
  Click here to go to www.nylj.com   United States, appellee v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 12:49 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 9:53 pm by Florian Mueller
I'm also a bit worried that Congress may not adopt the Open App Markets Act as we're approaching the end of the legislative term, and there is a risk of some Senators and United States Representatives preferring not to hold the decisive vote shortly before the Epic v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 11:48 pm
The United States Supreme Court in 2003 stated in Smith v Doe that the ex post facto application of these Sex Offender Registration Laws was not Punitive in nature, but civil and regulatory intent. [read post]
31 May 2018, 10:00 am by Liz Kramer
Today the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in another case involving the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
Yesterday, Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued a ruling denying the defendant's motion to dismiss or for summary judgment in Day v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm by Donald Thompson
Judiciary Law § 510 provides that to be qualified as a juror a person must: (1) be a citizen of the United States, and a resident of the county, (2) be not less than eighteen years of age, (3) not have been convicted of a felony, and (4) be able to understand and communicate in the English language. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm by UChicagoLaw
  And we all know that, as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote in Schenk v. [read post]