Search for: "West v. People" Results 2381 - 2400 of 3,466
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2012, 4:08 am by Charon QC
Proposed changes by the government to the compensation system will attack the rights of injured people and add insult to injury just when they are at their most vulnerable… Read more… I have been reading Bystander JP’s excellent Magistrate’s Blog since ‘time immemorial’. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, and Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:03 pm
The University of West Virginia Board of Trustees, 438 S.E. 2d 590 (W.Va. 1993), and Adkins v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 5:38 am by INFORRM
In my view, such a law will not be used by the less privileged people in our society. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:24 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
These are some of the things I've been tweeting about today: "Sorkin to graduates: you're 'incredibly well-educated dumb people'" pjblack.me/LdVuJD "Lady Comics: Who Needs Late Night? [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:33 am by Nancy Leong
  One trenchant example is Ricci v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:55 am by NBlack
Last week, the New York Court of Appeals handed down its decision in People v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:48 am by Aileen McColgan, Matrix.
On 25 April 2012 the Supreme Court handed down two major judgments on age discrimination: Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2012] UKSC 15 and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes [2012] UKSC 16. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  You don’t want to incentivize people to opt into a small claims process because it’s cheaper to deal with it than to fight. [read post]
9 May 2012, 2:51 am by Legal Beagle
One of his distant descendants, Henry Bellingham, is currently a foreign office minister and MP for North West Norfolk. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:05 am by Ruth Bonino
 In another decision heard at the same time, Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, the Supreme Court considered whether an employer’s policy of restricting promotion to employees with a law degree was justified indirect age discrimination against an employee who didn’t have a law degree and didn’t have the time to obtain one before retirement. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:03 am by Veronika Gaertner
V (1) (a) of the New York Convention (NYC) for having failed to initiate set-aside proceedings under the lex arbitri. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am by Rob Robinson
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]