Search for: "-LRA Wells v. King"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 3,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
State and State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
Intellectual Property The General Court declined to register the word mark “F–KING AWESOME” on the basis that it was not sufficiently distinctive to be registered as a trademark in the EU. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
Prior to trial, the defendant filed a motion to suppress the crack cocaine, as well as an admission he made to the officer. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm
., v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Our reigning relist king is Jordan v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
How well do you know Watergate? [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm
As a jurisprudential principle, the presumption against health law preemptions depends then on the accuracy of historical characterizations, as well as a malleable notion of regulatory “tradition” in health and safety. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:51 am
Highland v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
Graham v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 11:43 pm
What made me smile this week I’ve joined the Man v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:54 am
*A lot of good law bloggers have weighed in on the EEOC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:21 am
King Drug Co. of Florence, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 11:42 am
With the recent reminder from Kings Supreme in Grinshpun v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
It serves as well for the self constitution of the individual. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:24 am
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:21 am
Corp. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:33 am
Satterfield v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
