Search for: "A B C Insurance" Results 2401 - 2420 of 5,826
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2015, 1:45 pm by Lanigan
The Chicago Tribune story said that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is warning people that the cost of property deals may go up if one person in the closing party has been given kickbacks for: a. bringing a buyer to a mortgage broker b. bringing a buyer to a title company or c. bringing a buyer to a realtor This is a reason that it’s not good to have an All-in-One-Realtor/Title Insurance Company/Mortgage Lender who is “helping” you buy a… [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 1:45 pm by Lanigan
The Chicago Tribune story said that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is warning people that the cost of property deals may go up if one person in the closing party has been given kickbacks for a. bringing a buyer to a mortgage broker, b. bringing a buyer to a title company or c. bringing a buyer to a realtor. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 9:57 pm
., decided 7/16/2015)Plaintiff's residence was damaged in a fire in 2011 while insured under a policy of homeowners insurance issued by the defendant. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 5:53 pm by Joy Waltemath
The DOL is now saying that it expects to issue a final rule by March 2016 that revises its interpretation of Sec. 203(c) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA). [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 11:14 am by Jay Levine and Ryan Graham
Chief among LabMD’s defenses were: (a) the FTC lacked jurisdiction over the case, (b) the FTC lacked statutory authority under Section 5 to regulate data security, (c) the FTC’s complaint was unconstitutional and (c) LabMD’s customers did not suffer any substantial harm. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 5:00 pm by Yale Hauptman
  For some people in Jim’s situation Option B may be the way to go, redesigning their policy. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 8:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Maybe b/c it makes market work better—allocative efficiency. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 5:00 pm by Yale Hauptman
            Option B allows Jim to essentially redesign his policy to reduce the premiums he will pay. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 6:56 am
 Non-Duplication: This SUM coverage shall not duplicate any of the following: (a) benefits payable under workers' compensation or other similar laws; (b) non-occupational disability benefits under article nine of the Workers' Compensation Law or other similar law; (c) any amounts recovered or recoverable pursuant to article fifty-one of the New York Insurance Law or any similar motor vehicle insurance payable without regard to fault;(d) any… [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The County also separately moved for a post-trial collateral source hearing pursuant to CPLR 4545 (c) to reduce the jury's $7,416,045 award for future medication expenses. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:56 am by Arthur F. Coon
Key aspects and points of the Court of Appeal’s 19-page opinion on remand include: Consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the court of appeal refers to the exception to categorical exemptions under Guidelines § 15300.2(c) as “the unusual circumstances exception. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:37 am by Robert A. Epstein
The trial court found ex-husband “provided the [c]ourt with sufficient evidence of his health problems to show he ha[d] lost his life insurance and [was] unable to be gainfully employed. [read post]